What if my former spouse refused to comply with the Court ordered time-sharing?
Time-sharing is a very delicate subject and obviously of the utmost importance to both parents and the child. It is very important that attorneys, judges, and the parties take this subject very seriously. Florida law places the priority on the “best interests” of the child. Specifically,
The best interests of the child are always the paramount concern in child custody and time-sharing matter.”
For this reason when one parent refuses to comply with time-sharing, while the aggrieved parent’s interest will absolutely be a consideration, the best interests of the child will still be the priority. Thus the Court must always make findings that their orders are in the best interest of the children.
However, there are several sanctions the Court can impose. First the Court can always order the offending party to pay the other spouse’s attorney’s fees and costs in enforcing the time-sharing. Second, the Court may
after calculating the amount of time-sharing improperly denied, award the parent denied time a sufficient amount of extra time-sharing to compensate for the time-sharing missed, and such time-sharing shall be ordered as expeditiously as possible in a manner consistent with the best interest of the child and schedule such tune-sharing in a manner that is convenient for the parent deprived of time-sharing.”
This remedy requires the careful balancing of awarding necessary make up time-sharing while doing so in a manner which is in the best interests of the child. For example, it may be inappropriate for the Court to order an immediate full custody change in the middle of the school year. However, if it is in the best interest of the child, this is a remedy which the Court may impose.
Finally the Court can find criminal contempt and impose a sanction of incarceration. In a recent case the Court ordered five (5) days incarceration for the willful disregard for the Court’s time-sharing order.
Even in an unpleasant divorce it is crucial that both parents maintain the goal of achieving what is in the best interest of their child.
See, Cheek v. Hesik, 36 Fla. L. Weekly D2378 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).
Dustin Michael Butler is an Attorney with Martin Law Firm, P.L., whose practice focuses in Family Law and Civil Litigation. He is admitted to practice law in the State of Florida and the Federal Court for the Middle District of Florida. He primarily practices in Lee County Florida in Cape Coral and Fort Myers, Florida.

